ME/CFS AUSTRALIA (SA) INC Registered Charity 698 Mailing address: GPO Box 383, Adelaide, South Australia 5001 Office: 266 Port Road, Hindmarsh, South Australia 5007 Ph: (08) 8346 3237 ('834 MECFS') Office Hours: Wednesdays, 10am-3pm Support Line: (Mondays and Thursdays, 10am-3pm) Ph: (08) 8346 3237 SA country callers: Ph: 1300 128 339 (local call)
ME/CFS Australia (SA) Inc supports the needs of sufferers of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and related illnesses. We do this by providing services and information to members.
Disclaimer ME/CFS Australia (SA) Inc aims to keep members informed of the various research projects, diets, medications, therapies etc. All communication, both verbal and written, is merely to disseminate information and not to make recommendations or directives. Unless otherwise stated, the views expressed on this Web site are not necessarily the official views of the Society or its Committee and are not simply an endorsement of products or services. |
|
|||||||||||||
Smoke-free venues: is our State Government serious?Sunday 2 March 2008
Check out this good question from her re WOMADelaide – and the weak non-answer from the responsible Minister the Hon Gail Gago MLC. We know of members who find such events unsafe or inaccessible because of cigarette smoke. So read on and think about writing to the Minister: QUESTION IN THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Thursday 28th February 2008 WOMAD The Hon. SANDRA KANCK: I have a supplementary question: does the government support the ‘We’re smoke-free’ initiative under which WOMAD is badging itself? If so, does the state government provide any money for the ‘We’re smoke-free’ initiative? The Hon. G.E. GAGO (Minister for Environment and Conservation, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse, Minister Assisting the Minister for Health): The state government supports, in principle, all initiatives that promote anti-smoking and smoke-free venues. We support that in principle. However, clearly I have gone on record to say that, in terms of government policy, we need to ensure that we move forward in developing regulations and legislation and that it is not simply a knee-jerk reaction to popular public opinion but based on clear science. The science around the impact of outdoor smoking, in terms of passive health effects, is difficult to interpret and unclear. Therefore, the government is proceeding very cautiously and very thoroughly in terms of development of its own policy. In terms of other organisations, if their assessment is that there is strong support for smoke-free environments in their establishments, buildings, areas or events, it is certainly to be encouraged.
|
||||||||||||||