ME/CFS AUSTRALIA (SA) INC Registered Charity 698 Mailing address: GPO Box 383, Adelaide, South Australia 5001 Office: 266 Port Road, Hindmarsh, South Australia 5007 Ph: (08) 8346 3237 ('834 MECFS') Office Hours: Wednesdays, 10am-3pm Support Line: (Mondays and Thursdays, 10am-3pm) Ph: (08) 8346 3237 SA country callers: Ph: 1300 128 339 (local call)
ME/CFS Australia (SA) Inc supports the needs of sufferers of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and related illnesses. We do this by providing services and information to members.
Disclaimer ME/CFS Australia (SA) Inc aims to keep members informed of the various research projects, diets, medications, therapies etc. All communication, both verbal and written, is merely to disseminate information and not to make recommendations or directives. Unless otherwise stated, the views expressed on this Web site are not necessarily the official views of the Society or its Committee and are not simply an endorsement of products or services. |
|
|||||||||||||
Physiological cost of walking in those with CFSWednesday 28 October 2009
Physiological cost of walking in those with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS): A case-control study Authors: Lorna Paul a; Danny Rafferty b; Rebecca Marshal a Affiliations: DOI: 10.1080/09638280802652015 ABSTRACT Purpose. To examine the physiological cost of walking in subjects with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and a matched control group, walking at their preferred and at matched walking speeds. Methods. Seventeen people with CFS and 17 matched-controls participated in this observational study of physiological cost during over-ground gait. Each subject walked for 5 min at their preferred walking speed (PWS). Controls then walked for 5 min at the same pace of their matched CFS subject. Gait speed and oxygen uptake, gross and net were measured and oxygen uptake was expressed per unit distance ambulated. CFS subjects completed the CFS-Activities and Participation Questionnaire (CFS-APQ). Results. At PWS the CFS group walked at a slower velocity of 0.84 ± 0.21 m s-1 compared to controls with a velocity of 1.19 ± 0.13 m s-1 (p < 0.001). At PWS both gross and net oxygen uptake of CFS subjects was significantly less than controls (p = 0.023 and p = 0.025 respectively). At matched-velocity both gross and net physiological cost of gait was greater for CFS subjects than controls (p = 0.048 and p = 0.001, respectively). Conclusion. The physiological cost of walking was significantly greater for people with CFS compared with healthy subjects. The reasons for these higher energy demands for walking in those with CFS have yet to be fully elucidated. Keywords: Chronic fatigue syndrome; physiological cost; over-ground gait The above originally appeared here.
blog comments powered by Disqus |
||||||||||||||