Society Logo
ME/CFS Australia Ltd
Please click here to donate ME/CFS South Australia Inc
 
 
Facebook
 
ME/CFS SOUTH AUSTRALIA INC

Registered Charity 3104

Email:
sacfs@sacfs.asn.au

Mailing address:

PO Box 322,
Modbury North,
South Australia 5092

Phone:
1300 128 339

Office Hours:
Monday - Friday,
10am - 4pm
(phone)

ME/CFS South Australia Inc supports the needs of sufferers of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and related illnesses. We do this by providing services and information to members.

Disclaimer

ME/CFS South Australia Inc aims to keep members informed of various research projects, diets, medications, therapies, news items, etc. All communication, both verbal and written, is merely to disseminate information and not to make recommendations or directives.

Unless otherwise stated, the views expressed on this Web site are not necessarily the official views of the Society or its Committee and are not simply an endorsement of products or services.

Become a Member
DOCX Application Form (Word, 198 KB)
Why become a member?
 

The hallmark of CFS

Sunday 7 February 2010

CFIDS Association of AmericaFrom the CFIDS Association of America:

Post-exertional malaise is a cardinal feature of CFS that distinguishes it from many other conditions.

A study funded by the CFIDS Association and published by researchers at University of Pacific describes this consequence of modest physical and/or mental activity experienced by most, CFS patients.

Scientific director Suzanne Vernon, PhD, also describes how exercise challenges that provoke post-exertional malaise are being used by other research groups to further our understanding of CFS:

The Hallmark of CFS

By Suzanne D. Vernon, PhD
Scientific Director of the CFIDS Association of America

Over the years, there have been at least six published definitions for CFS. For research, the 1994 definition by Fukuda, et al. is presently the “standard.” The 2003 Canadian Clinical Definition for ME/CFS was the first one written specifically for use by practicing health care professionals seeing patients. Both require a thorough clinical evaluation and medical history to rule out possible conditions that could explain the patient’s symptoms. Both require a disabling degree of fatigue that substantially reduces the patient’s ability to do physical and mental activity. A key difference between these two definitions is that the Canadian definition identifies post-exertional malaise/fatigue (PEM) as a required symptom, whereas the Fukuda definition makes PEM “optional,” as one of eight case-identifying symptoms. Four of those eight symptoms must be present for a case to be considered CFS under the Fukuda research criteria.

Why this distinction? The authors of the Canadian clinical definition describe post-exertional malaise in detail, emphasizing the long recovery period ME/CFS patients require. They include a chart showing the response to exercise of healthy people compared to ME/CFS patients. Few diseases have the characteristic post-exertion “crash” that CFS does, making it a hallmark symptom. Indeed, studies by the Pacific Fatigue Laboratory at the University of the Pacific have shown that the exercise physiology of CFS patients is quite different from and, in many ways, worse than people with cardiovascular disease. In a paper published in the Journal of Women’s Health, the Pacific Fatigue Laboratory and collaborators examine the perceptions of CFS patients following exercise. Dr. Mark VanNess and colleagues determined that the post-exertional malaise was both real and incapacitating for the women with CFS whom they studied and that it was not attributed to fear of exercise or deconditioning. This is not surprising to those of you who experience post-exertional malaise, but (believe it or not) this has been a controversial topic in the medical and research world. Let’s look more closely at what this group of researchers did.

Dr. Snell, Dr. Stevens and Dr. VanNess

Dr. Snell, Dr. Stevens and
Dr. VanNess

This study included 25 women with CFS and 23 age-matched sedentary controls. There were no significant differences in the age, weight and height between CFS patients and controls. Each participated in an exercise test where they pedaled a bicycle ergometer until voluntary exhaustion and met criterion for maximal effort. For seven days following the exercise challenge, participants were asked to describe their symptoms in writing and to complete a survey called the Short Form-36 (SF-36) to measure self-perceived health status. Responses revealed that zero CFS patients recovered within 24 hours after the exercise challenge, compared to 85 percent of the sedentary controls. Forty-eight hours later, one CFS patient and the remaining controls reported complete recovery. Fifteen of the 25 CFS patients took more than five days to recover. The control subjects reported feeling energized and revitalized from the exercise. The CFS patients described extreme fatigue, pain, weakness and dizziness. The CFS patients reported lower SF-36 health status on physical and mental scales, but the mental assessments of emotion and mental health were not significantly different from controls. CFS subjects’ written descriptions indicated physiologic, rather than psychologic, effects of the exercise challenge. This post-exercise physiology is an indicator of the pathology of CFS and the authors suggest caution with exercise so that exercise benefits rather than harms.

SSV Study

Exercise challenge is a powerful paradigm for studying CFS because the exertion induces the hallmark post-exertion symptoms. While exercise studies are very difficult for CFS patients to participate in, it is an important study method that “levels the field.” Using an exercise challenge can effectively “calibrate” CFS subjects to the same degree of illness severity as one another and usually provoke differences between healthy and disease group controls that aren’t as easily seen under normal “at-rest” conditions. This increases the chance of identifying markers or causes – not only for the induced state of post-exertional malaise, but of CFS itself. 

In addition to providing funding for the VanNess study described above (in an earlier grants cycle), the CFIDS Association of America currently funds two other studies that use an exercise challenge to identify objective markers for CFS diagnosis and treatment. Kathy Light, PhD of the University of Utah Health Sciences Centers uses a moderate exercise challenge to identify specific CFS markers on the blood that can be used for objective diagnosis and to evaluate effectiveness of treatment. Sanjay Shukla, PhD, a microbiologist at the Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, uses an exercise challenge to determine if gut bacteria are different in CFS patients compared to normal controls and if they cross the gut into the blood stream to cause post-exertional malaise. These are all examples of the mission-oriented research the CFIDS Association supports to accelerate progress toward objective diagnosis and effective treatments for CFS.

VanNess JM, Stevens SR, Bateman L, Stiles TL, Snell CR.  Postexertional Malaise in Women with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.  J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010 Jan 24. [Epub ahead of print]

Dr Vernon's text originally appeared here.

 


 

blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous Previous Page