Society Logo
ME/CFS Australia Ltd
Please click here to donate ME/CFS South Australia Inc
 
 
Facebook
 
ME/CFS SOUTH AUSTRALIA INC

Registered Charity 3104

Email:
sacfs@sacfs.asn.au

Mailing address:

PO Box 322,
Modbury North,
South Australia 5092

Phone:
1300 128 339

Office Hours:
Monday - Friday,
10am - 4pm
(phone)

ME/CFS South Australia Inc supports the needs of sufferers of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and related illnesses. We do this by providing services and information to members.

Disclaimer

ME/CFS South Australia Inc aims to keep members informed of various research projects, diets, medications, therapies, news items, etc. All communication, both verbal and written, is merely to disseminate information and not to make recommendations or directives.

Unless otherwise stated, the views expressed on this Web site are not necessarily the official views of the Society or its Committee and are not simply an endorsement of products or services.

Become a Member
DOCX Application Form (Word, 198 KB)
Why become a member?
 

Irish Medical Times letter to the editor

Sunday 21 March 2010

Irish Medical TimesThe Irish Medical Times has published a letter from Tom Kindlon of the Irish ME/CFS Association in which he takes a recent article to task:

Fatigue research needed

Dear Editor,
You recently highlighted some comments on chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS)/myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) from a BMJ editorial (‘Defeatism undermines treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome’, IMT 26/2/10).

Santhouse et al claim cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and graded exercise therapy (GET) ‘have been shown to work’ in CFS. What the literature actually shows is that while such therapies can have an effect, this is not the same thing as ‘working’: a meta-analysis calculated the average ‘Cohen’s d’ effect size across various CBT and GET studies to be 0.48, which would generally be described as a small-moderate effect size (Malouff, 2008).

A recent review of three Dutch CBT studies found that, while patients reported lowered fatigue, their activity levels did not improve and remained low, calling into question claims that CBT is an effective rehabilitative strategy (Wiborg, 2010).

Systematic reviews tend to ignore ‘real world’ data. An audit of five Belgian rehabilitation clinics offering CBT and GET found that while improvements were recorded in various subjective outcome measures, there was negligible change in results from the exercise test and the average number of hours in paid employment decreased at the end and at follow-up.

The authors give the impression that nothing can be done if CBT and/or GET are not recommended. However a NIH-funded study in the US (Jason, 2007) found a management programme based on the pacing of activities showed superior results to the arms of the trial involving CBT and GET. High rates of adverse reactions have also been reported with graded exercise programmes (Kindlon and Goudsmit, 2010).

ME/CFS is increasingly recognised as a heterogeneous condition. Hopefully, research will shed more light on the subject.

Tom Kindlon,
Information Officer,
Irish ME/CFS Association

The letter originally appeared here.

 


 

blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous Previous Page