ME/CFS AUSTRALIA (SA) INC Registered Charity 698 Mailing address: GPO Box 383, Adelaide, South Australia 5001 Office: 266 Port Road, Hindmarsh, South Australia 5007 Ph: (08) 8346 3237 ('834 MECFS') Office Hours: Wednesdays, 10am-3pm Support Line: (Mondays and Thursdays, 10am-3pm) Ph: (08) 8346 3237 SA country callers: Ph: 1300 128 339 (local call)
ME/CFS Australia (SA) Inc supports the needs of sufferers of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and related illnesses. We do this by providing services and information to members.
Disclaimer ME/CFS Australia (SA) Inc aims to keep members informed of the various research projects, diets, medications, therapies etc. All communication, both verbal and written, is merely to disseminate information and not to make recommendations or directives. Unless otherwise stated, the views expressed on this Web site are not necessarily the official views of the Society or its Committee and are not simply an endorsement of products or services. |
|
|||||||||||||
More evidence that CFS and CFS+FM differ in their response to exerciseSaturday 7 January 2012
From Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise (via ProHealth):
Article: By Dane B Cook, Benjamin H Natelson, et al. Abstract: We have previously shown that when controlling for aerobic fitness and accounting for comorbid FM, CFS patients do not exhibit abnormal cardiorespiratory responses during maximal aerobic exercise compared to healthy controls, despite differences in pain and exertion. Purpose: The purpose of the present study was to examine cardiac and perceptual responses to steady-state, submaximal exercise [keeping below maxiumum heart rate] in CFS patients and healthy controls. Methods: Twenty-one CFS patients [13 CFS with comorbid FM (CFS+FM) and 8 CFS only] - and 14 controls completed 20 minutes of submaximal cycling exercise. Impedance cardiography was used to determine cardiac responses during exercise. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), perceived exertion (RPE) and leg-muscle pain were also measured. Data were analyzed using a doubly-multivariate, repeated-measures MANOVA to model the exercise response. Results: There was a significant multivariate Time by Group interaction (p < 0.05). [Assuming by comparison with the CFS-only subjects] The CFS+FM group exhibited an exercise response characterized by: • Higher stoke index, ventilatory equivalents for oxygen and carbon dioxide and perceived exertion, • Lower systolic blood pressure, • And similar heart rate responses. Conclusions: The present results extend upon our previous work with maximal exercise and show that CFS and CFS+FM differ in their responses to steady-state exercise. These results highlight the importance of accounting for comorbid conditions when conducting CFS research, particularly when examining psychophysiological responses to exercise. Source: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, Dec 12, 2011 doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182417b9a, by Cook DB, Stegner AJ, Nagelkirk PR, Meyer JD, Togo F, Natelson BH. Pain & Fatigue Study Center, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, New York; Department of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.
The above originally appeared here.
blog comments powered by Disqus |
||||||||||||||